At Keller Postman, Daniel has assisted with briefing in antitrust, product liability, and other cases. Daniel also supported the briefing and historical research for Keller Postman’s victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Daniel joined Keller Postman after graduating from Yale Law School, where he was a member of the law school’s Tech Accountability & Competition Project. In that role, he contributed to an amicus brief filed at the Supreme Court regarding the interpretation of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, drafted portions of state legislation regulating social media companies, and helped craft a lawsuit on behalf of people injured by privacy violations. Daniel also interned at the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and for Judge Victor A. Bolden on the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. Prior to law school, Daniel served as the founding chief of staff of NYC Kids RISE, a nonprofit that automatically opens and funds college savings accounts for every kindergartner in New York City public schools as a tool for wealth-building and educational opportunity.
Daniel will serve as a law clerk for Judge Jia M. Cobb on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and Judge Pamela A. Harris on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. At Yale Law School, Daniel published student notes in the Yale Law Journal and the Yale Journal on Regulation covering issues in antitrust law, labor law, and constitutional law. Daniel also graduated summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Harvard College.
"My proudest moment as a plaintiffs’ attorney was assisting Keller Postman in its victory at the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Robert Mallory in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. That case represented many of the things that I find most rewarding about plaintiffs’ lawyering: it raised a complex issue that required significant legal and historical research, it could not have been won without creative and rigorous advocacy, and the outcome helped to level the procedural playing field between plaintiffs and corporations. "